National Anarchism Illogical (Newbie Issues)

by Domini nulli, Sunday, November 11, 2007, 03:10 @ Anna Quist

It is difficult to see the logic in this brand of 'anarchism'.

Take the case of racial (non-cultural) separation. Why? Racial purity? That is illogical, as a biologist I know for a fact that can be more homologies between two people of different races than between two people of the same race. Thus since two people of different races may share more (genetically)than two of different races, the reasons really can't be for the sake of biology / genetics. If it is simply because some people prefer white skin color over black, or vice versa, you might as well base a society on whether people prefer to wear black T-shirts vs. red or a mix of red and black.

As far as cultural differences, such changes even occur readily within any population thinking human beings. Suppose it is a criterion for a society to be composed of only atheists. But a child begins to practice Buddhism. Will that child, then be excluded from that society?

I cannot believe that any anarchical society would be that conformist. Definitely this would be the absolutist rule of the majority and, thus, the antithesis of a free, anaarchical society. I would believe that an anarchical society champions freedom and diversity, and prevents such controls over its citizenry.(Unless the cultural difference demands interference with those possessing an alternate lifestyles(which, by the by, would be National Anarchists, radical religious fundamentalists, Republicans, etc.), then, I suppose those cultural adherents should not remain within the supposed anarachical society)

Please clarify, if and whee these analyses have strayed, particularly the adherent to National Anarchism. Thanks.